Cases 1 - 10 of 110
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Pierre et al
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Edwin F. Vargas
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, Jill Cuffaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Pierre et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Thompson
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, Jill Cuffaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. Pierre et al
as 1:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Kani C. Little
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, LaTonya Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Briggs et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Taji Abdullah
Defendant:
Gregory Briggs, Roger Lucas, Bruce Levalley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Briggs et al
as 4:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Taji Abdullah
Defendant:
Gregory Briggs, Bruce Levally, LaTonya Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ealy v. Schell et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Vernon L. Ealy
Defendant:
Christopher Schell, Warden of DCP, Unknown Intake Nurse and Nursing Staff at DCP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Briggs et al
as 4:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kevin Perry
Defendant:
Gregory C. Briggs, Lionell Pierre, Prime Care Medical Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Dewald v. French, et al
as 23-3268
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRENCH, Franklin County Prison, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER REED, Franklin County Prison, LIEUTENANT GARY ARTER and others
Pierre v. John Doe et al
as 4:2023cv02044
Plaintiff:
Macarton Pierre
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, C.O. Richards, Liz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
