Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Pierson v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Aaron Nathaniel Pierson
Defendant:
Monica Smtih, Mary Martin, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sam v. BancFirst et al
as 5:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ellijah Sam
Defendant:
BancFirst and Brian W Pierson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jivens-Pierson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv00446
Plaintiff:
Andrea Q Jivens-Pierson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pierson v. City of Jenks et al
as 4:2019cv00138
Defendant:
Jenks Police Department, Teresa Nowlin, City of Jenks and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pierson, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2018cv01170
Plaintiff:
Byron Pierson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pierson v. United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
as 5:2018cv00730
Petitioner:
Kenneth Pierson
Respondent:
United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierson v. Andrews et al
as 5:2018cv00674
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pierson
Defendant:
Don Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierson v. Integris Health Inc et al
as 5:2018cv00332
Plaintiff:
Candice D Pierson
Defendant:
Integris Health Inc, Integris Baptist Medical Center Inc, Larry W Houk , Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierson v. St. John Medical Center - Broken Arrow et al
as 4:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pierson
Defendant:
St. John Medical Center - Broken Arrow, Law Offices of Works & Lentz, Inc. and Harry A Lentz, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Pierson et al v. Andrews
as 4:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kenneth P Pierson and Paula Taylor
Defendant:
Don Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
