Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jones v. Pigeon Forge Police Department
as 3:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Pigeon Forge Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States Department of Labor v. Patel et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Nimesh Patel and Pigeon Forge Hospitality, LLC
Elevation Outdoor Advertising, LLC v. City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Elevation Outdoor Advertising, LLC
Defendant:
City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saul et al v. Pigeon Forge/Gatlinburg KOA Holiday and Kampgrounds
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dolores Saul and Walter Saul
Defendant:
Pigeon Forge/Gatlinburg KOA Holiday and Kampgrounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Breeden v. IMCMV Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Whitney Breeden
Defendant:
IMCMV Holdings, Inc. and IMCMV Pigeon Forge, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RLR Investments, LLC v. City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee
as 3:2019cv00279
Defendant:
City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
RLR Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Hollywood Wax Museum, LLC et al (PLR1)
as 3:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
Tina Akers
Defendant:
Hollywood Wax Museum, LLC, Hollywood Wax Museum-Pigeon Forge, LLC, Hollywood Wax Museum Entertainment Center-Pigeon Forge, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
