Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lucero et al v. Coppinger et al
as 1:2023cv10088
Plaintiff:
Manuel Robert Lucero, V., Robert Blanchette, James Williams and others
Defendant:
Kevin Coppinger, George Glynos and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Pike County Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv10583
Plaintiff:
Damion Davis
Defendant:
Pike County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawyer v. Pike et al
as 1:2020cv10098
Defendant:
David Pike, United Van Lines LLC and Unigroup WorldWide, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joyce Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11622
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Pike et al
as 4:2017cv40172
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Barbara Pike and Jane Doe
Counter_claimant:
Jane Doe
Counter_defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Doe v. Pike
as 4:2017cv40021
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Barbara Pike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miceli et al v. EG Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv12498
Defendant:
EG Systems, Inc. , James Gimeson , Mike Goodrich and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Miceli , Christopher Pike , Robert Sudbey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Peckham et al v. Board of Selectmen et al
as 3:2016cv30061
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Peckham and Nancy M. Peckham
Defendant:
Board of Selectmen, Dan Jaques, David Berndt and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Western Surety Company v. Interstate Engineering Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv13706
Plaintiff:
Western Surety Company
Defendant:
Interstate Engineering Corp., Arnold E. Pike, Cheryl G. Pike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Pike
as 4:2015cv40057
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
John Pike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
