Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PILES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
BRYAN K. PILES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PILES v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01723
Plaintiff:
BRYAN K. PILES
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs
PILE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03222
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ANDREW T. PILE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beiler v. Schneider et al
as 2:2017cv02196
Plaintiff:
Alan Beiler, Sr
Defendant:
Thomas P Schneider, . Hotwick, . Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Pile and Marine Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06174
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Arthur H. Bunte, Jr
Defendant:
Pile and Marine Construction, Inc. and BK Marine Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. K&S Piling Company, a Michigan corporation
as 1:2011cv02964
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice & Trainee Program Fund
Defendant:
K&S Piling Company, a Michigan corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Parker v. Walker et al
as 3:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
Lee Holden Parker
Defendant:
Roger E. Walker, Jr., Sherry Benton, Sherry Pile and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Essex Crane Rental Corporation v. Pile Foundation Construction Company Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
Essex Crane Rental Corporation
Defendant:
Pile Foundation Construction Company Inc and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
