Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07134
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
John Thymes, et al v. Steven Chang, et al
as 20-55650
Defendant / Appellee:
LINGCHONG CHEN, an individual, HOULING CHEN, an individual, LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN P. CHANG, in its corporate capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUEVINA HENRY and JOHN A. THYMES
John A. Thymes et al v. Steven P. Chang et al
as 5:2020cv00261
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Law Offices of Steven P. Chang, Houling Chen and others
Plaintiff:
John A. Thymes and Luevina Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tang et al v. Incare Metal Holdings, Corp et al
as 1:2020cv00935
Defendant:
Incare Metal Holdings, Corp and Tian Xin Situ
Plaintiff:
Zhong Ping Li, Carol Doe and Xi Tang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Tang et al v Happy Restaurant Inc.
as 1:2019cv07304
Defendant:
GUOWEI XIAO, ZHONGYAN HE, Tianming Zheng and others
Plaintiff:
YAN HONG YU, FEI GE SHANG, QIU YAN GUO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Frentzel v. Bearden et al
as 1:2019cv01962
Defendant:
Robert Bearden, Thomas J. Reilly, Michael A. Olson and others
Nominal Defendant:
Cloudera, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jason Frentzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fu v. Reilly et al
as 5:2019cv05705
Defendant:
Thomas J. Reilly, Robert Bearden, Ping Li and others
Plaintiff:
Jun Fu
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
