Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Pittman v. Pickett, et al
as 24-1153
Plaintiff: EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant: PICKETT, C/O, FONTEROT, C/O, PLATO, C/O and others
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff: JT Rich
Defendant: Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff: Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant: Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rich v. Stephens County, et al
as 24-6016
Plaintiff: J.T. RICH
Defendant: STEPHENS COUNTY, DEXTER LAWLEY, individual capacity as captain and internal affairs officer, CHEYENNE UNDERWOOD, individual capacity as Public Defender for Stephens County and others
Pittman v. Miller We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv01086
Petitioner: Jeremiah Christain Pittman
Respondent: Warden Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pittman (PS) v. Markham
as 1:2023cv03064
Plaintiff: Emanuel Pittman
Defendant: Markham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman (PS) v. Cardenas et al
as 1:2023cv03030
Plaintiff: Emanuel Pittman
Defendant: Cardenas, Bryant and Roland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rich v. Baird et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00883
Plaintiff: JT Rich
Defendant: Stephens County, Dexter Lawley, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman (PS) v. Kramer
as 1:2023cv02583
Plaintiff: Emanuel Pittman
Defendant: Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Cardenas, et al
as 23-1232
Plaintiff / Appellant: EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant / Appellee: CARDENAS, BRYANT and ROLAND JACKSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?