Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Heinz v. State of Ohio et al.
as 5:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Heinz
Defendant:
State of Ohio, David Yost, Eric N. Lindsey and others
Stark-Pittman v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Stark-Pittman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pittman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04200
Plaintiff:
Darla Pittman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pittman v. United States
as 3:2023cv02281
Petitioner:
Steven Pittman, Jr.
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pittman v. B-Lovette, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Sonya Pittman
Defendant:
B-Lovette LLC, Arkeyia Walker and B-Lovette, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pittman v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02487
Plaintiff:
Barbara Pittman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pittman v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Richard Pittman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Leathers et al v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Anne M Leathers, Michael Roe, Jr., Lonnie Pittman and others
Defendant:
United States, Joseph R Biden, Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Pittman v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Kathy Pittman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and DAVOL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pittman v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03552
Plaintiff:
Barbara Pittman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
