Cases 1 - 10 of 259
Ford v. Braxton et al
as 8:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Roderick Ford
Defendant:
Trenise Braxton, Florida Department of Revenue Child Support and Barbara Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pittman et al v. NGM Insurnace Company
as 2:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
DAVID PITTMAN and KRISTIN PITTMAN
Defendant:
Deanne B. Criswell and NGM Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
ALLEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
FDOC, DONALD LEAVINS, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. McCelland et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jamal Leslie Vass, Redbull, Neptune and others
Defendant:
Jeffery McCelland, Gina Bennett, Ashley D. Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. McKinney et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
B. McKinney, Officer Burnette, Secules and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Pittman et al
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
C. Pittman and Ms. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Prock et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Nathaniel Bowen
Defendant:
Prock, Pittman, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIERNEY v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24772
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M TIERNEY
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, DONALD LEAVINS, PITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Pittman
as 3:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
C. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv02911
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Pittman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
