Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Pittman v. Peters et al
as 5:2023cv00219
Petitioner:
Nichole Pittman
Respondent:
Colette S. Peters, Warden Lovett And Any/All Other Wardens Hazelton Correctional Complex and All Staff/Employees in Any/All Unit Team Positions at Hazelton Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pittman v. Triple T Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
James E. Pittman
Defendant:
Triple T Express, Inc. and Eyob Tesfay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Pittman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv12002
Plaintiff:
Annette Pittman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11531
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jan Pittman and Ennis Lee Pittman, Jr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv10274
Plaintiff:
Burnice Pittman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv03786
Plaintiff:
Paula Gail Pittman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv29400
Plaintiff:
Amy S. Pittman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv28487
Petitioner:
Maurice Pittman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pittman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv25669
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff:
Christine M. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv24821
Plaintiff:
Judy E. Pittman
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
