Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,923
Suffolk County v. Corrado
as 24-1108
Plaintiff: SUFFOLK COUNTY, DIANE ZIELENSKI, NATALIE WRIGHT and others
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER CORRADO
IN RE: Passenger Vehicle Replacement Tires Antitrust Litigation
as MDL NO. 3107
Plaintiff: Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant: Liaison Counsel for Defendants
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01231
Plaintiff: CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER, CHARLTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, CHILTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Carroll v. Pitkonen, et al.
as 24-2522
Plaintiff: CURTIS-GENE CARROLL, Aggrieved Plaintiff, Sui Juris
Defendant: TUYET PITKONEN, MARK HODGSON, Attorney, SHAUN HUPPERT, Attorney and others
Unknown Plaintiff v. Unknown Defendant
as 7:2024cv02882
Plaintiff: Unknown Plaintiff
Defendant: Unknown Defendant
Other: joe smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3301 Fraudulent Transfer Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff: TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant: DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Lau v. NYSARC Trust Services, Inc.
as 24-1050
Plaintiff: GILBERT LAU
Defendant: DOROTHY ZYSKOWSKI, Director of Trusts, JAMIE HARLA, Team Leader-Trust Administrator, NYSARC TRUST SERVICES, INC. and others
IN RE: Yu Luo Shelf Bracket ('683) Patent Litigation
as MDL NO. 3118
Plaintiff: Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant: Liaison Counsel for Defendants
In Re: Totally Hooked, LLC
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner: Totally Hooked, LLC
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Placeholder
Defendant: Defendant Placeholder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Woodruff, et al. v. Google LLC
as 24-2479
Petitioner: KIMBERLEY WOODRUFF, MEAGHAN DELAHUNTY, MEGHAN CORNELIUS and others
Respondent: GOOGLE LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?