Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Wagner, individually and on behalf of the Hess Corporation Employees' Savings Plan, and all others similarly situated v. Hess Corporation et al
as 6:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wagner
Defendant:
Hess Corporation, Hess Corporation Employee Benefit Plans Committee, Brent L. Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ferris v. Blucora, Inc. Key Leadership Change of Control Severance Plan et al
as 4:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Ferris, III
Defendant:
Blucora, Inc. Key Leadership Change of Control Severance Plan, Blucora, Inc. Leadership Change of Control Severance Plan Committee and Christopher Walters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Laliberte et al v. Quanta Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv03290
Plaintiff:
Mary Laliberte and Marie McKnight
Defendant:
Quanta Services, Inc., The Board of Trustees of Quanta Services, Inc. and The Quanta Services, Inc. 401(K) Savings Plan Committee
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Co. et al
as 2:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Diagnostic Affiliate of Northeast Hou, LLC d/b/a 24 Hour CovidDRT-PCR Laboratory on Behalf of Patient CS and Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC on behalf of and as attorney in fact for patient CS doing business as 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory
Defendant:
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Co., Cigna Health & Walare Plan Committee and Cigna Medical Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
d/b/a 24Hour CovidRT-Laboratory v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Co. et al
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Diagnostic Affiliate d/b/a 24Hour CovidRT-Laboratory
Defendant:
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Co., Cigna Medical Plan and Cigna Health and Walare Plan Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
DiLuzio et al v. Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan et al
as 4:2020cv00490
Defendant:
Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan Committee, Newfield Exploration Company and Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan
Plaintiff:
Daniel DiLuzio, Kyle Everett, Sandra Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Clark v. Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company, et al.
as 4:2019cv03221
Defendant:
Newfield Exploration Company, Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan Committee and FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN
Plaintiff:
Zinnialynn Clark
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Evans v. Newfield Exploration Company et al
as 4:2019cv02552
Defendant:
Newfield Exploration Company, Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan and Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan Committee
Plaintiff:
Darek Dean Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atiram v. Phillips 66 Company et al DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:17cv3740. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:17cv3013
as 4:2017cv03740
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company, Greg C. Garland, Paula A. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Zam Atiram , Jeffery Schweitzer , Jonathan Sapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Schweitzer et al v. The Investment Committee of the Phillips 66 Savings Plan et al
as 4:2017cv03013
Plaintiff:
Raul Ramos, Jonathan Sapp, Jeffery Schweitzer and others
Defendant:
Sam Farace, John Does 1-10, inclusive and The Investment Committee of the Phillips 66 Savings Plan
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Zam Atiram
Consolidated Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company, Greg C. Garland, Paula A. Johnson and others
Counter Defendant:
Kevin Mitchell, Jesse A. Stephan, Alex J. Shabet and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
