Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Toy v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Toy, Sr.
Defendant:
Tameka Jones, Abraham Gates, Humphreys County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. Pontotoc MS Police Dept et al
as 3:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Nakita Donita Long
Defendant:
Pontotoc MS Police Dept, Captain Mark Baldwin, Matthew Pannell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Batesville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
William Kelly Nolan
Respondent:
Batesville Police Dept. and Panola Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James v. Sunflower County Sheriffs Department et al
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Crandall James
Defendant:
Sunflower County Sheriffs Department and Inverness Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. Crystal Springs City Police Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
DCorius K. Alford
Defendant:
Crystal Springs City Police Dept., Bob, Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Nichlos et al
as 1:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ray Reed
Defendant:
Nichlos and Starkville Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Coffeeville Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Tyrowone Louis Kimble
Defendant:
Coffeeville Police Dept., Mark Martin, Gage Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Coffeeville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Tyrowone Kimble
Defendant:
Coffeeville Police Dept., Grant Gammill , Mark Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Ferguson et al
as 4:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Latonia Roberson
Defendant:
James Ferguson , Kosciusko Police Dept. and Mark Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. Everett et al
as 3:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lynn Lofton
Defendant:
Melanie Everett, Bill Rasco, Looney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
