Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ferreira et. al. v. County of Suffolk et. al.
as 2:2019cv02101
Defendant:
Suffolk County Police Officer John Doe #1 official capacity, Suffolk County Police Officer John Doe #3 individual capacity, Suffolk County Police Officer John Doe #5 official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Vitigliano and Yan Simas Ferreira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferreira et al v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2019cv02100
Defendant:
SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1 official capacity, SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #3 individual capacity, SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #5 official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Vitigliano and Yan Simas Ferreira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02558
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Jane Does 2, Police Officer John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00355
Plaintiff:
Antwan Houston
Defendant:
The City of New York , Bulog Enterprises, Inc. , John Doe #1 and others
Cross_claimant:
Bulog Enterprises, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Bulog Enterprises, Inc. , John Doe #1, New York City Police Officers Jane Does #2-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILLING v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2007cv04100
Plaintiff:
GLENN RILLING
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA-POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shaulov v. The City Of New York. et al
as 1:2007cv00208
Plaintiff:
Felix Shaulov
Defendant:
The City Of New York., Police Officer John Doe 1, Police Officer Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bolden v. One Stop Home Service Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00057
Plaintiff:
Leroy Bolden
Defendant:
Hector Perez and Police Officer Jane Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
