Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pearson v. Marple Township et al
as 2:2023cv04444
Plaintiff:
Vonda Pearson
Defendant:
MARPLE TOWNSHIP, MARPLE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, Chief Brandon Graeff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HARTIN v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv04204
Plaintiff:
TROY HARTIN
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, CITY OF CHESTER, SHERIFF JERRY L SANDERS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLER et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2020cv06301
Plaintiff:
DONNA MILLER and NEAL MILLER
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICERS JANE DOE 1-15, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKENNA v. WOLK et al
as 2:2018cv03746
Plaintiff:
LIAM PATRICK MCKENNA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, RICHARD ROSS, JR., POLICE OFFICERS JANE DOES 1-15 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN et al v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2017cv03494
Plaintiff:
ISIAH MORGAN and LEO GARDNER
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS , JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUZ et al v. HULMES et al
as 2:2015cv02234
Plaintiff:
JOEL CRUZ , ADALERTO MORALES RODRIGUEZ and JOSHUA MORALES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY, PATRICK BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIELDS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv02923
Plaintiff:
LEON FIELDS , TAMYRA FIELDS , TIMOTHY JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAMIEN STEVENSON, K. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAGANS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS et al
as 2:2007cv06116
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. HAGANS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NEW JERSEY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, THE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
