Cases 1 - 10 of 724
Mulet v. Modern Pool Cage Painting, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Wirney Mulet
Defendant:
Modern Pool Cage Painting, LLC and Evis Pina Garcia
Poole et al v. CooperSurgical, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Poole and Brad Kimball
Defendant:
CooperSurgical, Inc. and The Cooper Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vincent Poole v. State of Florida, et al
as 24-11238
Plaintiff:
VINCENT POOLE
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, FDC MIAMI ASSISTANT WARDEN, JANE DOE and others
Poole, Leo V. v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2024cv80469
Plaintiff:
Leo Vincent Poole and Vincent Leo Poole
Defendant:
Rick Bradshaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinch A Penny, LLC v. Pruett Brothers Pool Services, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Pinch A Penny, LLC
Defendant:
Pruett Brothers Pool Services, LLC and Joseph K. Pruett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Pinch A Penny, LLC v. Pruett Brothers Pool Services, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Pinch A Penny, LLC
Defendant:
Pruett Brothers Pool Services, LLC and Joseph K. Pruett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Poole, Vincent L. v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2024cv20551
Plaintiff:
Vincent Leo Poole
Defendant:
State of Florida, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo et al v. Maximus Pro Solutions Corp et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Alden Murillo and Daniel Murillo
Defendant:
Maximus Pro Solutions Corp doing business as Maximus Pools and William Da Silva
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
