Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Poole v. Shropshire et al
as 1:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Poole, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert Kareem Shropshire and Toi Brianna Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Poole v. Wynthrope Forest apartments
as 1:2020cv00273
Defendant:
Wynthrope Forest apartments
Plaintiff:
Tiana Poole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
(UD)(PS) Wasatch Pool Holdings, LLC v. Cooper
as 2:2020cv00114
Defendant:
Kapresha Cooper
Plaintiff:
Wasatch Pool Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Caruso v. Poole et al
as 1:2017cv00956
Plaintiff:
John Caruso
Defendant:
Derrick Poole and Tiffany Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
ICON Owner Pool 1 LA Business Parks LLC v. Sean Patterson et al
as 8:2017cv00305
Defendant:
Does, Sean Patterson and Toad USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
ICON Owner Pool 1 LA Business Parks LLC
Van Buren Plaza LLC v. Advantage Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00212
Defendant:
Advantage Manufacturing, Inc., Advantage Pools and Ponds, Inc., Lyann C. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Van Buren Plaza LLC
Wasatch Pool Holdings, Inc. v. Bailey
as 1:2015cv00776
Plaintiff:
Wasatch Pool Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Mario Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pacifica Loan Pool One, LP v. Joshiwa R. Clements et al
as 2:2013cv05689
Defendant:
Joshiwa R. Clements and Does
Plaintiff:
Pacifica Loan Pool One, LP
Deutsche Bank National Trust C v. Bernard Mitchell
as 11-16405
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of the Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2007-A8 Mortgage Pass through certification series 2007-11 under pooling and Servicing Agreement dated June 1, 2007, its assign and/or successors in interest
Defendant - Appellant:
BERNARD MITCHELL
Franklin v. Poole, et al (MAG+)
as 2:2011cv00320
Plaintiff:
Nue Cheer Franklin
Defendant:
Jimmy Poole and Montgomery County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
