Cases 1 - 10 of 726
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carlton v. Wrozier et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
KK Wrozier, City of Smyrna GA, Smyrna Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mulet v. Modern Pool Cage Painting, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Wirney Mulet
Defendant:
Modern Pool Cage Painting, LLC and Evis Pina Garcia
Vincent Poole v. State of Florida, et al
as 24-11238
Plaintiff:
VINCENT POOLE
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, FDC MIAMI ASSISTANT WARDEN, JANE DOE and others
Poole et al v. CooperSurgical, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Poole and Brad Kimball
Defendant:
CooperSurgical, Inc. and The Cooper Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Poole, Leo V. v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2024cv80469
Plaintiff:
Leo Vincent Poole and Vincent Leo Poole
Defendant:
Rick Bradshaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo et al v. Maximus Pro Solutions Corp et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Alden Murillo and Daniel Murillo
Defendant:
Maximus Pro Solutions Corp doing business as Maximus Pools and William Da Silva
Poole, Vincent L. v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2024cv20551
Plaintiff:
Vincent Leo Poole
Defendant:
State of Florida, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
POOLE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
CURTIS WEDO POOLE
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
