Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Pitts et al
as 1:2023cv05222
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Rob Pitts, Joseph Young-Lincoln, Vral Glanville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Osani v. Karram et al
as 1:2023cv04711
Defendant:
Edward Fareed Karram, Eddie Karr, Juleen Karram and others
Plaintiff:
Meredith Osani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bey v. Poole et al
as 1:2023cv03704
Plaintiff:
Kingstate Bey
Defendant:
Officer Alex Poole, Norcross Police Department, Norcross Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company v. Pool et al
as 1:2023cv03637
Petitioner:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Respondent:
Dyletha Pool, Paul Manigo, Ranell Manigo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Poole v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv02437
Plaintiff:
Krystal Poole
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
POOLE v. FIELDER et al
as 5:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
WILLIE CLARENCE POOLE
Defendant:
MS FIELDER and MS JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POOLE v. MEDICAL STAFF et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
WILLIE CLARENCE POOLE
Defendant:
MEDICAL STAFF and DOOLEY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. United Pool Maintenance, LLC
as 1:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
Ryan Austin
Defendant:
United Pool Maintenance, LLC
Marignay v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv05013
Plaintiff:
Jaymon Marignay
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Clayton County Jail, Clayton County Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
