Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Karen Stromberg, et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 19-15159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAYAN CRUTCHER, JEFFREY DAVIS, DAVID KOPLOVITZ and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN HART, MICHELLE MACKAY, GAIL MARGOLIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Poon, et al. v. Knight Refrigerated, LLC, et al.
as 1:2018cv01608
Plaintiff:
Lai Chiang Joanna Wu and Yiu Ming Poon
Defendant:
Knight Refrigerated, LLC and Carolyn Jean Kline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poon et al v. Kline et al
as 1:2018at00849
Plaintiff:
Lai Chiang Wu and Yiu Ming Poon
Defendant:
Knight Refrigerated, LLC and Carolyn Jean Kline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GOWADIA v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2018cv01485
Plaintiff:
NOSHIR S. GOWADIA
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, FLORENCE POON, SUSAN MITSUYOSHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poon v. Apple NYC Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv09647
Plaintiff:
Mei Chun Poon
Defendant:
Apple NYC Corp., Touch of East Nails Spa Inc. and Wen Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Poon v. Apple NYC Corp., d/b/a Apple NYC Day Spa et al
as 1:2017cv06954
Defendant:
Apple NYC Corp., d/b/a Apple NYC Day Spa, Touch of East Nails Spa Inc. and Wen Chen
Plaintiff:
Mei Chun Poon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cross v. Conway et al
as 1:2017cv08244
Plaintiff:
Ali L. Cross
Defendant:
Clauide Conway, Sophia Khan, Yan Poon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poon v. Vow to be Chic
as 3:2017cv01456
Plaintiff:
Sandra Poon
Defendant:
Vow to be Chic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Frederick et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 5:2017cv02171
Plaintiff:
Scott Frederick , Charles Poon , Andrea Hogan and others
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
