Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Davison v. Pototski
as 1:2026cv01722
Defendant:
Pototski
Plaintiff:
Ricky Alan Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pototski et al v. I-Tow Towing Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv06741
Plaintiff:
Oxana Pototski, K.A.P. an infant under the age of eighteen (18) years by her mother and natural guardian, Oxana Pototski and Oxana Pototski, individually
Defendant:
I-Tow Towing Inc. and Wilmon Chislom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Pototski et al v. I-Tow Towing Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv06741
Plaintiff:
Oxana Pototski and K.A.P.
Defendant:
I-Tow Towing Inc. and Wilmon Chislom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Peter Pototsky v. City of Nogales, et al
as 20-15927
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH BARTH, DOES, named as Spouse of Keith D. Barth; named as Spouse of Michele Cardillo, SCARLETT BUNTING and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER POTOTSKY
Pototsky v. Nogales, City of et al
as 4:2020cv00078
Defendant:
Nogales, City of, Scarlett Bunting, Keith Barth and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Pototsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Peter Pototsky
as 18-10125
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PETER POTOTSKY, AKA Peter Gregory Pototsky
Pototsky v. United States Border Patrol et al
as 4:2014cv02418
Plaintiff:
Peter Pototsky
Defendant:
United States Border Patrol, United States Customs and Border Protection, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pototsky v. Bront
as 1:2013cv07832
Plaintiff:
Yury Pototsky
Defendant:
Michael Bront
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pototsky v. United States Department of the Army
as 4:2012cv00764
Plaintiff:
Peter Pototsky
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Peter Pototsky v. Atlas Air Incorporated, et al
as 10-15991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER POTOTSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
ATLAS AIR INCORPORATED, THOMAS J. KASSIN, FORD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
