Cases 41 - 50 of 460
Strickland v. Madison et al
as 1:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Nathan De'Jarvis Strickland
Defendant:
Mr. Madison, Mr. Randy Akies, Ms. Melody M. Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales et al v. Central Transport, LLC.
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
VicMarie Morales, Robert Powell and Larhonda Smith
Defendant:
Central Transport, LLC.
SPIVEY v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN HUMPHREY, MALONE, DR JOHN ROWLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHIDDON v. POWELL et al
as 7:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
JASON KYLE WHIDDON
Defendant:
Sheriff CARLTON POWELL, KEVIN DENNIS, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Commissioner Social Security
as 3:2021cv00066
Plaintiff:
Tatyana Powell
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
ADAMS v. POWELL
as 7:2021cv00145
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP ADAMS
Defendant:
Sheriff CARLTON POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04407
Plaintiff:
Dillard Powell
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N V et al
as 1:2021cv00177
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L POWELL
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caines v. Maddox et al
as 1:2021cv03602
Plaintiff:
Kevin Emanuel Caines
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Chief Deputy LoRandy Akies, Captain Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn et al v. Powell et al
as 1:2021cv03163
Plaintiff:
Darwin Quinn and Mitchelle'l Sium
Defendant:
Roland Powell and Rich Broke Entertainment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
