Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Barbara Sanchez v. NuSil Technology, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv03329
Defendant:
Nusil Technology LLC, PRAXAIR, INC., a Delaware Corporation, NuSil Technology, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barbara Sanchez v. Does
as 2:2020cv01867
Plaintiff:
Barbara Sanchez
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Praxair, Inc. and NuSil Technology LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bishop et al v. Hobart Brothers, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00062
Plaintiff:
Rachael Bishop and Nathan Bishop
Defendant:
Praxair, Inc., Hobart Brothers, LLC and XYZ Business Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Firestone v. Praxair, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00795
Plaintiff:
Harley Firestone
Defendant:
Praxair Distribution, Inc., Praxair Services, Inc., Praxair Surface Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Larry Lizotte v. Praxair Inc.
as 09-35332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY A. LIZOTTE, a single person
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAXAIR INC., a Washington corporation
McCormick et al v. Praxair Inc
as 2:2008cv01505
Plaintiff:
Michael J McCormick and Lorraine J McCormick
Defendant:
Praxair Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lizotte v. Praxair Inc
as 2:2007cv01868
Plaintiff:
Larry A Lizotte
Defendant:
Praxair Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Maemori et al v. Air Liquide America Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00332
Defendant:
Viacom Inc., Polarit Welding, Inc., TDY Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Kim, Felipa C. Menor, Gail Toshiko Yamasaki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Painter et al v. The Boc Group Inc et al
as 3:2007cv00659
Plaintiff:
Christopher Painter, Christopher Painter, Elisabeth Painter and others
Defendant:
The Boc Group Inc, Airco Inc, BOC Financial Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
