Cases 1 - 10 of 498
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Perkins v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Office of the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
barclay et al v. dixon et al
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff:
leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant:
webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mikanda v. Trump
as 23-7659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ex Parte NEYEMBO MIKANDA, CHSC
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD TRUMP, 45th President of the United States of America
Nwoye v. Obama
as 23-1178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ikemefuna Stephen Nwoye
Defendant / Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, Former President of the United States of America/Senior Citizen and Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, Former First Lady of the United States of America/Senior Citizen
MC Management of Rochester LLC. v. Biden
as 23-1086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MC Management of Rochester LLC., Pane Vino LLC., Pharaohs GC Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States, Nancy Pelosi, in her official capacity as the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Charles Schumer, in his official capacity as the United States Senate Majority Leader and others
Clanton v. blinken et al
as 1:2023cv04284
Plaintiff:
Stanford Charles Clanton
Defendant:
antony john blinken secretary of state, et al. United States doing business as Antony John Blinken, janet louise yellen secretary of treasury, et al. United States doing business as Janet Louise Yellen, merrick garland attorney general, et al. United States doing business as Merrick Garland, et al. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. Department of Justice
as 23-206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark William Lane
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Components Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
