Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Schofield v. Tampa Police Department et al
as 8:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Preston Leonard Schofield
Defendant:
Tampa Police Department and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHOFIELD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2020cv00172
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff:
PRESTON LEONARD CHOFIELD and PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Scott et al
as 8:2018cv01852
Defendant:
Armed Forces Bank, N.A., Rick Scott, Kzonic Calhoun and others
Plaintiff:
Preston Leonard Schofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHOFIELD v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE et al
as 4:2018cv00185
Plaintiff:
PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02959
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schofield v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2016cv00294
Plaintiff:
Preston Leonard Schofield
Defendant:
State of Florida, Seminole County Sheriff's Office, Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Dekleva et al
as 8:2015cv00954
Plaintiff:
Preston Leonard Schofield
Defendant:
James Dekleva and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Dekleva et al
as 6:2015cv00693
Plaintiff:
Preston Leonard Schofield
Defendant:
James Dekleva and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Dekleva et al
as 8:2015cv00814
Plaintiff:
Preston Leonard Schofield
Defendant:
James Dekleva and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Castor et al
as 8:2013cv02455
Plaintiff:
Preston Leonard Schofield
Defendant:
Jane Castor and City of Tampa, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
