Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Primus v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP et al
as 2:2023cv05183
Plaintiff:
Kishaunt Primus
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP and Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Primus v. Stirling et al
as 4:2022cv02470
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Primus
Defendant:
Brian Stirling, Dr. Brynes and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Maynor v. Primus et al
as 1:2021cv00742
Defendant:
Sumter-Lee Regional Detention Center, Lt. Shirah and Cpl. Primus
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Maynor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jarrell-Landolfi v. Carter et al
as 5:2020cv00983
Defendant:
Eric Sullivan, Beverly Carter, Bruce Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jarrell-Landolfi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Leshick v. Primus Builders Inc et al
as 3:2018cv03061
Defendant:
Primus Builders Inc and Republic Refrigeration Inc
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Leshick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper v. Major et al
as 5:2018cv02355
Defendant:
Brittany Stall, Reginald Primus, Jevelton Gee and others
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leshick v. Primus Builders Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01167
Plaintiff:
Steven Leshick
Defendant:
Primus Builders Inc and Republic Refrigeration Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Primus v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc Associates Health and Welfare Plan
as 6:2017cv02440
Plaintiff:
Crystal Primus
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc Associates Health and Welfare Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Primus v. Pascoe et al
as 2:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Primus
Defendant:
David Michael Pascoe, L C Knight, Margaret M McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Primus v. Taylor
as 4:2014cv03015
Petitioner:
James Anthony Primus
Respondent:
Edsel T Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
