Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Owl Feather- Gorbey v. John or Jane Doe et al
as 0:2023cv03229
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Michael S. Owl Feather- Gorbey, Prince Michael S. Owl Feather- Chow-Chow (Son of Heaven) and Tsunami Khan
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Henry McMaster, Uncle Sam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Mallory v. Dorchester County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv01688
Plaintiff:
Prince Charles Mallory
Defendant:
Dorchester County Detention Center, John Does 1-44, 2 Medical University of South Carolina Mental Health Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Bishop et al
as 2:2022cv03166
Plaintiff:
Brentley Sims
Defendant:
William C Bishop, Michael Crockett, E. Whitfield Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Prince
as 5:2021cv01270
Plaintiff:
Steven A Morris
Defendant:
Deputy Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv00823
Petitioner:
Stevie Prince, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Prince v. Jeter et al
as 5:2019cv01750
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Prince
Defendant:
Sumter Lee Detention Center, Sheriff Anthony Dennis, Lieutenant Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. State of South Carolina et al
as 8:2018cv02596
Defendant:
Shannon Sturgill, Montford Shuler Caughman, State of South Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. USA
as 3:2018cv01961
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jarvis Codell Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mallory v. North Charleston Police Department
as 2:2018cv00890
Plaintiff:
Prince Charles Mallory
Defendant:
North Charleston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lynch et al
as 1:2016cv03043
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Williams
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch , Travis Bragg , Ian Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
