Cases 1 - 10 of 240
Ceasar v. Bradley et al
as 2:2021cv01643
Defendant:
CORIZON, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Dr. Elizabeth Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covert v. Houser et al
as 1:2020cv02022
Defendant:
Ms. B. Mason, Ms. White, RN Brenda Houser and others
Plaintiff:
John Covert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vega v. Rockovich et al
as 1:2020cv01577
Plaintiff:
Isaac Vega
Defendant:
Luzerne County Prison Health Services, Antwanette Terrana and Robert Rockovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01441
Defendant:
WETZEL, DIRECTOR OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICE UNIT, S.C.I. WAYMART, U.M. KAY and others
Plaintiff:
CHAVIS and RONALD CHAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. Mataloni et al
as 1:2020cv00069
Defendant:
M.D. Stanley Stanish, Renato Diaz, Prison Health Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone K. Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz, Jr. v. Prison Health Services et al
as 1:2019cv01735
Defendant:
Dr. Paul Noel, Dr. John Steinhart, Dr. Courtney Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Bienvenido Ruiz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARMON v. GIBBS et al
as 2:2017cv01653
Plaintiff:
SCOTT T. HARMON
Defendant:
DENNIS GIBBS, JEFFERY ROEHANNA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMAX v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2016cv06566
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOMAX
Defendant:
FRANK J. TENNIS, RICHARD ELLERS, JOHN SYMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. BAUGHMAN et al
as 3:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
CHARLES T. JONES
Defendant:
PEGGY BAUGHMAN, KENNETH CAMERON, DORETTA CHENCHARICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02154
Plaintiff:
Taji Jemal Lee
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc. , Prison Health Services, Inc. , Tony Iannuzzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
