Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Clyne v. The Idaho Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Defendant:
The Idaho Dept. of Corrections, Community Corrections, Idaho District 4 Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veenstra, et al. v. Little, et al.
as 1:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Kent Ellis, Charles Lynn Sacolick and others
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho State Board of Correction Members, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belue v. Parole and Pardons et al
as 1:2021cv00080
Respondent:
Parole and Pardons, Idaho Maximum Security Prison, Probation and Parole Commission and others
Petitioner:
Jerry Dwaine Belue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Drennon v. Blades et al
as 1:2019cv00021
Defendant:
Idaho Commission of Pardons & Parole, Angel Dobrev, Randy Blades and others
Plaintiff:
Richard J Drennon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Idaho Legislative Representatives et al
as 1:2016cv00329
Plaintiff:
Scott Jones, Robert Coy, Richard J Drennon and others
Defendant:
Idaho Legislative Representatives, State of Idaho, Idaho Secretary of State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Colson et al
as 1:2012cv00344
Plaintiff:
Terrence Matthews
Defendant:
Chris Colson, Chip Morgan, City of Boise Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MLDC Government Services Corp. v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00297
Plaintiff:
MLDC Government Services Corp.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Jackye Squire Leonard , Andrew Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Department of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Kirkley A Evans
Defendant:
Department of Probation and Parole, Twin Falls Police Department, Canyon County Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
