Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Alexander v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Damion Alexander
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagedorn v. Obama et al
as 2:2016cv16919
Plaintiff:
Brian Albert Hagedorn
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Joseph F. Dunford, Eric Fanning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Parks v. Probation & Parole et al
as 5:2016cv01686
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Parks, Sr
Defendant:
Probation & Parole and Lenord Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Blanchard et al
as 5:2016cv01439
Plaintiff:
Ellis Ray Hicks, Jr
Defendant:
Nancy Blanchard, Jennifer Clason, Danny Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Kaufman County District Attorney Office et al
as 2:2016cv13830
Plaintiff:
Scott Boatner Pierce
Defendant:
Kaufman County District Attorney Office, Kaufman County, Adult Probation Office Kaufman County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Fannin et al
as 5:2015cv02708
Plaintiff:
Al laJohn Ross
Defendant:
Eddie Fannin and Supervisor of Probation of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billizone v. Maise et al
as 2:2015cv03384
Plaintiff:
Ernest Billizone, Sr.
Defendant:
Lisa Maise, Louisiana Department of Probation and Parole and Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Natchitoches Parish Probation & Parole
as 1:2015cv01417
Plaintiff:
Ronnie White
Defendant:
Probation & Parole Natchitoches Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Probation and Parole of Natchitoches Parish
as 3:2015cv00209
Defendant:
Probation and Parole of Natchitoches Parish
Plaintiff:
Ronnie White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fraiser v. Beene et al
as 5:2015cv00523
Plaintiff:
James Kevin Fraiser
Defendant:
Orlando Beene and Minden District Office Division of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
