Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plater v. Walton et al
as 5:2020cv01091
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
Probation and Parole Services, Alexandra Miller and Reginald Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Probation and Community et al
as 5:2018cv01187
Plaintiff:
Prince Edward Jackson and Brian Craig Herd
Defendant:
Sara Faye Inight, FNU Society, Marcus Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00591
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Foster
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Probation Office and Stephen S Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Redford v. Stanly et al
as 4:2013cv00716
Plaintiff:
Earl D Redford
Defendant:
Sheriff Stanly, Lennal D Mos, Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stout et al v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 5:2013cv00753
Plaintiff:
Lance Stout and Barbre Stout
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service , Oklahoma Highway Patrol , Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Oklahoma County Probation Board
as 5:2013cv00365
Petitioner:
Nicois Megale Smith
Respondent:
Oklahoma County Probation Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McConnel v. Department Of Justice et al
as 5:2012cv00127
Petitioner:
Joseph Edward McConnel
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice and United States Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Webb v. Department of Human Services et al
as 6:2011cv00134
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Choctaw Nation Tribal Complex, Probation and Parole Office and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Driggers v. Clark et al
as 5:2010cv00877
Plaintiff:
Paul W Driggers
Defendant:
A Clark, John Doe, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
