Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Proctor v. Wan Hai Lines Ltd et al
as 4:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Tony A. Proctor
Defendant:
Wan Hai Lines Ltd and Wan Hai Lines Singapore, PTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cure v. Aldridge et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Mary Cure
Defendant:
Buck Aldridge and Jim Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Adams et al
as 4:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
William Franklin Adams, Toni Michelle Adams, Amy Lester Astin and others
Defendant:
Bordeau Metals Southeast, LLC, BB&K Holdings, LLC, BB&K Holdings TN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Urzi v. Dix et al
as 3:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Urzi
Defendant:
Sheriff Darrell Dix, Captain Kyle Phillips, J. Storey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Schultz v. Ameris Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Brooke Schultz
Defendant:
Ameris Bank, Nicole Stokes, Palmer Proctor and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Schultz v. Stokes et al
as 1:2023mi00018
Plaintiff:
Brooke Schultz
Defendant:
Nicole Stokes, Palmer Proctor, Robert Odom and others
Schultz v. Stokes et al
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Brooke Schultz
Defendant:
Nicole Stokes, Palmer Proctor, Robert Odom doing business as Ameris Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
