Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rosas v. Akron Concrete Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Arturo Rosas
Defendant:
Akron Concrete Products, Inc. and Patrick R. Walgamuth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
WALTERS v. NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WALTERS
Defendant:
NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
STEPHEN KNOWLES et al v. RESCO PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2019cv05035
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 4 INDIANA/KENTUCKY, INDIANA BRICKLAYERS LOCAL 4 JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING COMMITTEE, LOUISVILLE PENSION FUND and others
Defendant:
Resco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
COFFEY v. BEST CHOICE PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2019cv02532
Defendant:
BEST CHOICE PRODUCTS, INC. and SKY BILLIARDS
Plaintiff:
JENNY COFFEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Isley, Sr v. Heidtman Steel Products, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Isley, Sr.
Defendant:
Heidtman Steel Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MILLER v. WAYNE DAIRY PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2015cv00802
Plaintiff:
JARED MILLER
Defendant:
WAYNE DAIRY PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
BARMES v. NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2014cv01819
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BARMES
Defendant:
NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
HOOK v. MADISON PRECISION PRODUCTS, INC.
as 4:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. HOOK, II
Defendant:
MADISON PRECISION PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Pereida v. Genesis Products Inc
as 3:2014cv01550
Plaintiff:
Fabian Pereida
Defendant:
Genesis Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BARTON et al v. ROYAL FOODS PRODUCTS, LLC
as 1:2014cv00577
Plaintiff:
DANNY BARTON and INDIANA TEAMSTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND
Defendant:
ROYAL FOOD PRODUCTS, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
