Cases 1 - 10 of 97
SU v. FECONDO et al
as 2:2024cv01414
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
DONNA M. FECONDO, Joseph Silvestri & Son, Inc. and Joseph Silvestri & Son, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND et al v. JEFFREY M. LONG ELECTRIC, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03186
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PENSION PLAN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY M. LONG ELECTRIC, LLC and JEFFREY M. LONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
SU v. MARLTON PIKE PRECISION, LLC 401(K) AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN et al
as 1:2023cv02972
Plaintiff:
SECRETARY OF LABOR and JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
MARLTON PIKE PRECISION, LLC 401(K) AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN and ANTONIO L. SALA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
WALSH v. BANKOVICH
as 3:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
MARTIN J. WALSH
Defendant:
PATRICK BANKOVICH, DUPENN, INC. doing business as IGM CARBON and DUPENN, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND et al v. SAFE-ROUTE ELECTRIC, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04055
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PENSION PLAN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Defendant:
SAFE-ROUTE ELECTRIC, INC. and MELVIN DAVIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND et al v. DURIAN ELECTRIC, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03968
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PENSION PLAN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICALWORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Defendant:
DURIAN ELECTRIC, LLC and RASHETA C. JUNIOUS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND et al v. TAGGART & SONS ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING, INC.
as 2:2022cv03567
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 ZONE 2 PENSION PLAN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Defendant:
TAGGART & SONS ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
WALSH v. INTERARCH, INC et al
as 1:2022cv05289
Plaintiff:
MARTIN J. WALSH
Defendant:
INTERARCH, INC, SHIRLEY S. HILL, VERNON W. HILL, II and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND et al v. IJB ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, LLC
as 2:2022cv02870
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PENSION PLAN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Defendant:
IJB ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
PECOU v. BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
JUBRIL PECOU
Defendant:
BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY and PROFIT SHARING PLAN COMMITTEE OF BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
