Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Blackrock Allocation Target Shares: Series S Portfolio et al v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 1:2014cv09401
Plaintiff:
Blackrock Allocation Target Shares: Series S Portfolio, Blackrock Balanced Capital Portfolio (FI), BLACKROCK CORE ACTIVE BOND FUND B and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re: Libor-Based Financial
as 17-2360
Plaintiff:
The Berkshire Bank, Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico and Directors Financial Group
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prudential Investment Portfolios 2, FKA Dryden Core Investment Fund, on behalf of Prudential Core Short-Term Bond Fund and Prudential Core Taxable Money Market Fund
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Banks PLC and others
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, FKA J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, FKA Banc of America Securities, LLC
In Re: Libor-Based Financial
as 17-1569
Plaintiff:
Carpenters Pension Fund of West Virginia, City of Dania Beach Police & Firefighters' Retirement System, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Ravan Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Schwab Short-Term Bond Market Fund, Schwab Total Bond Market Fund, Schwab U.S. Dollar Liquid Assets Fund and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lloyds Banking Group plc, Bank of America Corporation, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC and others
Defendant:
Credit Agricole S.A., Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, BNP Paribas S.A. and others
In Re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2011md02262
Plaintiff:
303 Proprietary Trading LLC, 303030 Trading LLC, 33-35 Green Pond Road Associates, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Linda Zacher
Defendant:
All Defendants, BBA Enterprises, Ltd., BBA Libor, Ltd and others
Consolidated Defendant:
RBS Citizens, NA
Interested Party:
ICAP Europe Ltd. and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Petitioner:
Brian McCormick, Vito Spillone and Maxwell Van De Velde
Not Classified By Court:
Tullett Liberty Brokerage Inc., Tullett Prebon Financial Services LLC, Tradition America LLC and others
Receiver:
FDIC, as receiver
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
County of Mendocino, ICAP, City of Houston and others
Respondent:
BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Prudential Investment Portfolios 2 v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv07975
Plaintiff:
PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS 2
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Prudential Investment Portfolios 2 v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as NCW/3:15-cv-00413
Plaintiff:
Prudential Investment Portfolios 2
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A.
Prudential Investment Portfolios 2 v. Barclays Bank plc et al
as 1:2015cv07031
Defendant:
Barclays Bank plc, Barclays Capital Inc., Barclays PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Prudential Investment Portfolios 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prudential Investment Portfolios 2 v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00413
Plaintiff:
Prudential Investment Portfolios 2
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS 2 et al v. BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv04242
Plaintiff:
PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS 2 and THE PRUDENTIAL SERIES FUND
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA , NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , ASSET BACKED FUNDING CORPORATION , BANC OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prudential Investment Portfolios 2 and Prudential Core Taxable Money Market Fund v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv04189
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., Barclays Bank P.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS 2 and PRUDENTIAL CORE TAXABLE MONEY MARKET FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
