Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pruitt v. USA
as 2:2022cv01941
Petitioner:
Brandon Lamar Pruitt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Zarate v. CCDC et al
as 2:2022cv01680
Plaintiff:
Stephen Zarate
Defendant:
CCDC, LVMPD, Detective Belt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt et al v. Charles Anderson et al
as 2:2022cv01676
Plaintiff:
Dionne Pruitt, Belinda Hill and Dorothy Hill
Defendant:
United States of America ex rel United States Postal Service, Charles Anderson and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Zarate v. Pruitt et al
as 2:2022cv01449
Plaintiff:
Stephen Zarate
Defendant:
Chenel Pruitt, Detective Belt, Sgt Rispowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Breen et al v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2020cv00541
Plaintiff:
Katharine Breen, Alain Michael, Christopher Pussman and others
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International and Sabrina Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stutts v. Lyon County et al
as 3:2019cv00552
Defendant:
Lyon, County of, Carson-Tahoe Health, Tyrell Joyner and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Stutts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Not Used
as 3:2019cv00550
Defendant:
Lyon, County of, Tyrell Joyner, Erik Pruitt and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Stutts and Not Used
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00234
Defendant:
Kathy Bennet, Cindy Buckmeyer, Fernley, City of and others
Plaintiff:
David Mathew Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Righthaven LLC v. Pruitt
as 2:2010cv01347
Defendant:
Fred Pruitt
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
