Cases 1 - 9 of 9
TINSLEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ANNKLEIN FORENSIC CENTER, DOREEN STANZIONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUTNEY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv15716
Defendant:
SCO. CLARK, SGT. GILBERT, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PUTNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. GHAEDI et al
as 3:2018cv12923
Defendant:
PSYCHOLOGIST DIANA SCHMIDT, KAVEH GHAEDI, D.O. and TREVOR RUDGE, M.D.
Plaintiff:
OMAR J. ROSS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv13582
Plaintiff:
JERRY RAY BELT
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NORTHEAST REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BRAGG v. COHEN et al
as 1:2015cv07006
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant:
GERALDINE COHEN, MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, JOHN/JANE DOE 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALFORD et al v. WOJCHIECHOWICZ et al
as 3:2015cv06750
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
BO ROBINSON PSYCHOLOGIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2011cv02910
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HILL
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CHRIS CHRISTIE, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORR. CENTER (M.C.A.C.C.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv01449
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LOPPIN, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BULLOCK v. ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2010cv01412
Plaintiff:
WOODROW BULLOCK, JR.
Defendant:
ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JANE DOE HSA #1-15 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
