Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Jones v. Cardwell et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Treyshawn L. Jones
Defendant:
Andre Cardwell, Bradley Hansford, D. Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Puckett et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Aaron Reynolds
Defendant:
Nurse Practioner ANR Joyce Puckett, Tracy Bird and Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Puckett et al
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Aaron Reynolds
Defendant:
Joyce L. Puckett, Tracy Bird and Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chilko et al
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Antonio De'Shawn Smith
Defendant:
Officer Chilko, David Puckett, Officer Corneh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puckett v. Kirk et al
as 3:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Durwood Puckett
Defendant:
Dr. (William D.) Kirk, Barry Brady, Trina Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Puckett et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Aaron Reynolds
Defendant:
Joyce L. Puckett, Tracy Bird, Karen Ramey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnett v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Bobby Eugene Arnett
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Zachary Page, Brittany Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Puckett et al
as 3:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
Brice Jamar Rhodes
Defendant:
D. Puckett, Jerry Collins, Charels Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chilko et al
as 3:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Antonio Deshawn Smith
Defendant:
Officer Chilko, Officer Corneh, D. Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puckett v. Hewell et al
as 5:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Devin Puckett
Defendant:
Brad Hewell and Wendell Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
