Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PUTMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 0:2018cv62104
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA, SUNSHINE STATE HEALTH and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Arthur Putman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04922
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv62334
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv62330
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kilby et al v. Edlin et al
as 1:2012cv00966
Plaintiff: J. Kilby and The Crosslink Group, LLC
Defendant: Andrew Edlin , The Lansky Partnership, LLLP, et al , Lansky Enterprises, Inc., et al and others
Counter_claimant: The Lansky Partnership, LLLP, et al , Andrew Edlin and Lansky Enterprises, Inc., et al
Counter_defendant: J. Kilby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-14117
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Putman v. City of Atlanta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv03243
Plaintiff: Christopher M. Putman
Defendant: City of Atlanta , Anwar T. Bradley and Red Door Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02555
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. Putman
as 4:2008cv01503
Plaintiff: Roy W. Davis
Defendant: T. Michael Putman
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Putman v. Hanceville, City of et al
as 5:2008cv00990
Plaintiff: Calvin Putman
Defendant: Hanceville, City of and Thomas G. Sorrell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?