Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Burris v. County Of Putnam et al
as 7:2022cv10379
Plaintiff:
Shane Burris
Defendant:
County Of Putnam, Putnam County Sheriff's Department, JOHN DOES (1)-(10) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sloan v. Langley et al
as 1:2022cv05951
Plaintiff:
Derek Sloan
Defendant:
Robert L Langley, Kevin Radovich, Brian Neary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan v. Langley et al
as 1:2022cv03987
Plaintiff:
Derek Sloan
Defendant:
Robert L. Langley, Kevin Radovich, Brian Neary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taranto et al v. Putnam County et al
as 7:2021cv02455
Plaintiff:
George Taranto and Karen Taranto
Defendant:
Robert L. Langley, Jr., William Quick, Vincent Dalo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef
Rosado v. County Of Putnam et al
as 7:2020cv06347
Defendant:
County Of Putnam, PO Rossiter William, Town of Putnam Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Rosado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv04680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cannizzaro et al v. Putnam County Sheriff's Department et al
as 7:2018cv05778
Defendant:
PO John Doe 1, Deputy Sheriff Thomas Curran, PO John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Cannizzaro, Alexander Schvets, Jonathan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livulpi v. Putnam County Sheriff's Department et al
as 7:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michael Livulpi
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriff's Department , Matthew T. Monroe , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Donald B. Smith , Putnam County Sheriff's Department and County of Putnam
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Doe v. Smith et al
as 7:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Donald B. Smith, Putnam County Sheriff's Department and County of Putnam
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
