Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Sherfield et al v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sherfield, Sr, Leslie R Loyd, Taufano CT Guyton and others
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath and Mike Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00510
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Doe et al
as 4:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Jon Q Wright
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bowersock v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00848
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Bowersock, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Lexington Correctional Center and Q Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyner v. Hi Q Inc
as 5:2021cv00608
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services Inc and Hi Q Inc doing business as Health IQ Inc
Plaintiff:
Tara Armado and Maki Tyner
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Trujillo et al
as 5:2021cv00433
Defendant:
Daniela Gastelum Orozco doing business as Cocos Locos Dos Night Club, Daniela Gastelum Orozco, Esther Q Trujillo and others
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eddy v. Prater et al
as 5:2021cv00302
Defendant:
David Brown, Jim Anderson, Board of County Commissioners County of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Jess Q Eddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
