Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plumley v. LSC Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00030
Defendant:
M. Shan Atkins, LSC Communications, Inc., Shivan S. Subramaniam and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
PROFESSIONAL ORTHOPEDICS ASSOCIATES, PA et al v. ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv04713
Plaintiff:
PROFESSIONAL ORTHOPEDICS ASSOCIATES, PA and JASON COHEN, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Defendant:
ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. and QUAD GRAPHICS INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3410
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02525
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01675
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Brian Steele, et al v. Aramark Corp, et al
as 12-4009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN STEELE and JUDIKAELLE STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK CORP and ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL INC
Defendant - Appellant:
QUAD GRAPHICS INC
Brian Steele, et al v. Aramark Corp, et al
as 12-3942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN STEELE and JUDIKAELLE STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK CORP, ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL INC and QUAD GRAPHICS INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
