Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv02222
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. Quigley et al
as 0:2021cv01948
Plaintiff: Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
Defendant: Kelly Quigley, Montevideo Public Schools/Independent School District #129, Bill Sprung and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01461
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Quigley v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00805
Defendant: Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff: Clint Quigley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv01106
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00251
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Quigley v. Wyeth et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv03336
Plaintiff: Susanna Quigley
Defendant: Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Debra Kaye Quigley
as 0:2009cr00369
Defendant: Debra Kaye Quigley
Plaintiff: USA
Yang v. City of Shakopee, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv03216
Plaintiff: Neng Por Yang
Defendant: City of Shakopee, The, Shakopee Police Dept., The, John Buetow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Yang v. Rosenbaum et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv03190
Plaintiff: Neng Por Yang
Defendant: Marilyn Brown Rosenbaum, Linda J. Gallant, Robert W. Groth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?