Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06231
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Victor Miranda Quijada v. Attorney General United States of America
as 26-2590
Petitioner:
VICTOR ANTONIO MIRANDA QUIJADA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
QUIJADA JR et al v. TRAJECTOR INC et al
as 1:2026cv00150
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Quijada, Jr., JEFFREY PHILLIPS and Kimberly Philips
Defendant:
TRAJECTOR INC and TRAJECTOR MEDICAL LLC doing business as VET COMP AND PEN MEDICAL CONSULTING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04635
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Quijada Lara (PS) v. Baltazar
as 1:2026cv02397
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Quijada Lara
Defendant:
Juan Baltazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dragasits v. Massia, et al.
as 26-3182
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DRAGASITS
Defendant:
MASSIA, B. GARCIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01767
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01221
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.