Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Matey v. Crane Co., et al
as 8:2022cv00841
Plaintiff: Irma Matey and Richard D. Matey
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Crane Co. and others
Not Classified By Court: Jonathan Hollingshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Quimby Equipment Co., Inc. v. Callaghan Pump & Controls, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02915
Defendant: Callaghan Pump & Controls, Inc.
Plaintiff: Quimby Equipment Co. Inc and Quimby Equipment Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Charles Corley, et al v. Fairbanks Morse Pump Corp, et al
as 14-13659
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES CORLEY and MYRA CORLEY
Defendant - Appellee: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., individually and as successors in interest to Allied Chemical, Inc. f.k.a. Bendix Corporation, f.k.a. Bendix Corporation, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIS, LLC, FAIRBANKS MORSE PUMP CORPORATION and others
: BILL VANN COMPANY, INC., MCCONNELL SALES AND ENGINEERING CORP., REFRACTORY SALES & SERVICE CO., INC. and others
Charles Corley, et al v. Fairbanks Morse Pump Corp, et al
as 14-13659
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES CORLEY and MYRA CORLEY
Defendant / Appellee: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., individually and as successors in interest to Allied Chemical, Inc. f.k.a. Bendix Corporation, f.k.a. Bendix Corporation, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIS, LLC, FAIRBANKS MORSE PUMP CORPORATION and others
Not Classified By Court: MCCONNELL SALES AND ENGINEERING CORP., REFRACTORY SALES & SERVICE CO., INC., LONG-LEWIS, INC. and others
McCalvey v. Atlas Copco Compressors, L.L.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00064
Defendant: Atlas Copco Compressors, L.L.C., Buffalo Pumps, Inc , Carrier Corp and others
Plaintiff: Gerald D McAlvey
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation , Georgia-Pacific L.L.C. , Ingersoll Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant: Atlas Copco Compressors, L.L.C., Buffalo Pumps, Inc , CBS Corporaton and others
Counter_claimant: Pneumo Abex Corporation
Counter_defendant: Imo Industries, Inc. , Schutte & Koerting, Inc., ITT Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00831
Plaintiff: Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: General Electric Company, IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windlass Company
Cross_defendant: General Electric Company , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00835
Plaintiff: Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windless Company
Cross_defendant: IMO Industries Inc. , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
AKERS v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv67338
Plaintiff: NANCY R. AKERS
Defendant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AESYS TECHNOLOGIES LLC, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akers v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2011cv00281
Plaintiff: Nancy R. Akers
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Aesys Technologies LLC, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Crane Co. , Oakfabco, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Aesys Technologies LLC, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CORLEY et al v. LONG-LEWIS, INC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv61113
Plaintiff: CHARLES CORLEY and MYRA CORLEY
Defendant: LONG-LEWIS, INC, BIRMINGHAM RUBBER AND GASKET CO., INC., BILL VANN COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?