Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Christopher Grief v. Mark Williams
as 20-3946
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK K. WILLIAMS, Warden, F.C.I. Elkton
Defendant:
D. K. WILLIAMS, In her official capacity as Warden at FCI Danbury in Connecticut, HERMAN QUAY, Warden, in his official capacity and KIMBERLY ASK-CARLSON, Warden of MDC Brooklyn, sued in her official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GRIEF
Grief v. Williams
as 4:2019cv00677
Defendant:
Warden H. Quay, D.K. Williams and K. Ask-Carlson
Plaintiff:
Christopher Grief
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grief v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2018cv02571
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden H. Quay
Plaintiff:
Christopher Grief
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burley v. FBOP et al
as 6:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Martin Burley
Defendant:
FBOP, C. Eichenlaub, Richard Ives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perry v. Agricultural Dept. et al
as 6:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Agricultural Dept., Dept. of Justice, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Husband v. Dixon et al
as 6:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Eunice Husband
Defendant:
M. Dixon, L.R. Etris, L. Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spigelman v. Samuels et al
as 6:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joel Steven Spigelman
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Richard B. Ives, H. Quay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Spigelman v. Samuels et al
as 6:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
Joel Steven Spigelman
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Richard B. Ives, H. Quay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Singer v. Ives et al
as 6:2012cv00008
Petitioner:
Edward Levi Singer
Respondent:
Richard Ives and H. Quay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sykes v. Quay et al
as 6:2011cv00303
Plaintiff:
Overtis Sykes
Defendant:
H. Quay, Sheila R. Mattingly, Federal Burea of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
