Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
READING JET SALES, II, LLC v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
as 2:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
READING JET SALES, II, LLC
Defendant:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
READING JET SALES, II, LLC v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
as 5:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
READING JET SALES, II, LLC
Defendant:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cole et al v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
as 2:2023cv20647
Plaintiff:
ANGELA COLE and Beatrice Roche
Defendant:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
METROPOLITAN NEUROSURGERY ASSOCIATES v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv06195
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN NEUROSURGERY ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NAEDELE et al v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC. et al
as 2:2020cv15881
Defendant:
LUDMILLA OLESNICKY, M.D., LAWRENCE TSAO, M.D., JANE ROES 51-100 and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL NAEDELE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NAEDELE v. NAEDELE et al
as 2:2020cv15879
Plaintiff:
CHERYL NAEDELE
Defendant:
ZSOLT JOBBAGY, M.D., LUDMILLA OLESNICKY, M.D., LAWRENCE TSAO, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
