Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Simonian v. The Quigley Corporation
as 1:2010cv01259
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Simonian
Defendant:
The Quigley Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Public Patent Foundation, Inc. v. The Quigley Corporation
as 1:2010cv01552
Plaintiff:
Public Patent Foundation, Inc. and Public Patent Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
The Quigley Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION v. KARKUS et al
as 2:2009cv02438
Plaintiff:
THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION and THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION
Defendant:
TED KARKUS, TED KARKUS, JOHN EDMUND LIGUMS, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
KARKUS v. THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv02239
Plaintiff:
TED KARKUS
Defendant:
THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION and GUY QUIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION v. KARKUS et al
as 2:2009cv01725
Plaintiff:
THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION
Defendant:
TED KARKUS, JOHN EDMUND LIGUMS, SR., MARK BURNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Howard Polski, et al v. Quigley Corporation
as 07-3350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Howard J. Polski and Sheryl L. Polski
Defendant - Appellee:
The Quigley Corporation
THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION v. WACHOVIA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01343
Plaintiff:
THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION, THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION and THE QUIGLEY CORPORATION
Defendant:
WACHOVIA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., WACHOVIA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., FIRST UNION NSURANCE SERVICES AGENCY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Baynham v. Quigley Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00010
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Henry Baynham and Carolyn Henry Baynham
Defendant:
Quigley Corporation, Quigley Corporation, Quigley Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
