Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Maharaj v. Stairs et al
as 1:2023cv02977
Plaintiff:
Dr. Damien D. Maharaj and Damien D. Maharaj
Defendant:
Janice Stairs, Karl Hanneman, David Peat and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gonzales Quintanilla v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Gloria Gayle Gonzales Quintanilla
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
USA v. $55,897.00 in United States Currency
as 1:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$55,897.00 in United States Currency
Interested Party:
Silvia Rodriguez and Martha Quintanilla
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States v. Quintanilla-Dominguez
as 22-1198
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL QUINTANILLA-DOMINGUEZ, AKA Luis F. Lopez-Montez, AKA Cesar Rodriguez
Abarca-Quintanilla, et al v. Garland
as 22-9510
Petitioner:
VILMA DEL ROSARIO ABARCA-QUINTANILLA and YULISSA LISBETH ABARCA-ABRACA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Rojas-Quintanilla v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Alcira Rojas-Quintanilla
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Quintanilla v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv01264
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Francisco Juan Quintanilla and Juan Francisco Quintanilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Orellana-Quintanilla v. Barr
as 19-9594
Petitioner:
SAMUEL NEFTALI ORELLANA-QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
