Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Acosta v. Sumerian Enterprises LLC d/b/a Back Nine, et al.
as 3:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Sumerian Enterprises LLC dba Back Nine, Justin Kaufman and Sumerian Enterprises LLC
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Solis et al
as 7:2019cv00146
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Nick Solis, Emily Solis and West Texas Bulldog Oilfield Services LLC Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
CWP Asset Corporation v. OSHC, et al
as 19-60417
Petitioner:
CWP ASSET CORPORATION, doing business as Mister Car Wash
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION and R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Wynnewood Refining Co., L.L.C. v. OSHC, et al
as 19-60357
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION and R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Petitioner:
WYNNEWOOD REFINING COMPANY, L.L.C., and its successors
Acosta v. Mason et al
as 3:2019cv01202
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Mas-Tek Engineering & Associates, Inc., Stephen Mason and Mas-Tek Engineering Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. Ben E. Keith Company
as 5:2019cv00527
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Ben E. Keith Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Houston Aquarium, Incorporated v. OSHC, et al
as 19-60245
Petitioner:
HOUSTON AQUARIUM, INCORPORATED, and its Successors
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION and R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
SJ Louis Construction of Texas v. OSHC, et al
as 19-60224
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION and R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Petitioner:
SJ LOUIS CONSTRUCTION OF TEXAS, LIMITED
Acosta v. Modern Cotton, LLC, et al
as 5:2019cv00119
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Deanne Moore Quill, Modern Cotton, LLC dba The Quilt Haus and Modern Cotton, LLC dba Way to Sew
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
